Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
markerless_motion_capture [2024/03/15 17:01] – ethan | markerless_motion_capture [2024/03/15 17:02] (current) – ethan | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
**Data Analysis** | **Data Analysis** | ||
The captured motion data can be further analyzed for various purposes, such as performance assessment, technique improvement, | The captured motion data can be further analyzed for various purposes, such as performance assessment, technique improvement, | ||
+ | |||
+ | While marker motion capture offers high accuracy and precision, it can be time-consuming to set up and require specialized equipment and expertise. In recent years, markerless motion capture systems that use computer vision and deep learning techniques to track movements without markers have gained popularity, especially in the sports and entertainment industries. These systems offer the advantage of easier setup but may have limitations in terms of accuracy and tracking complex movements. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Non-Intrusive**: | ||
+ | * **Ease of Setup**: Setting up a markerless system is generally faster and requires less equipment compared to traditional marker-based systems. | ||
+ | * **Realism**: | ||
+ | * **Versatility**: | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, markerless motion capture systems also have some limitations. They may struggle to capture fine details and can be less accurate than marker-based systems, especially in complex movements or situations with occlusions (when parts of the body are hidden from camera view). The accuracy of markerless systems can vary depending on lighting conditions and the quality of the cameras and software used. |